Difference between revisions of "Risks and benefits"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Undo revision 1000949 by Cd (talk))
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<font size="100" color="red"><div style="position:fixed;left:0px;top:0px;width:100%;height:100%;z-index:9999999999999999999999999;">In late October, Janet Hathaway, in response to a [[Bush Administration]] pesticide monitoring plan, stated, "Allowing the EPA to condone continued use of a chemical whenever the benefits outweigh the risks is absolutely anathema to the environmental community." [http://www.fumento.com/alar1.html]
+
In late October, Janet Hathaway, in response to a [[Bush Administration]] pesticide monitoring plan, stated, "Allowing the EPA to condone continued use of a chemical whenever the benefits outweigh the risks is absolutely anathema to the environmental community." [http://www.fumento.com/alar1.html]
 
[[Category:Environmentalism]]
 
[[Category:Environmentalism]]

Revision as of 22:32, August 18, 2012

In late October, Janet Hathaway, in response to a Bush Administration pesticide monitoring plan, stated, "Allowing the EPA to condone continued use of a chemical whenever the benefits outweigh the risks is absolutely anathema to the environmental community." [1]