Difference between revisions of "Talk:Herodotus"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Oldoligarch (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
So fix it, [[User:Oldoligarch]]. I don't see what's stopping you. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 12:21, 11 April 2007 (EDT) | So fix it, [[User:Oldoligarch]]. I don't see what's stopping you. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 12:21, 11 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you want to see what a good article on Herodotus is go to wikipedia.org. The one here is Mickey Mouse level. | ||
Revision as of 18:23, April 11, 2007
Totally inadequate entry
- This is actually quite a large and detailed entry, by present standards hereabouts. It needs a bit of work, certainly, but not as much as many. And thousands of important people and things don't yet have an entry at all. Might I enquire if you personally are planning to do anything about this situation? --Jeremiah4-22 16:55, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
Only if the powers that be at Conservapedia.org are serious about having a complete encyclopedia. Is one line plus a quote from the post office sufficient for the "father of history"?
So fix it, User:Oldoligarch. I don't see what's stopping you. Dpbsmith 12:21, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
If you want to see what a good article on Herodotus is go to wikipedia.org. The one here is Mickey Mouse level.