Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Primates"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jeremiah4-22 (talk | contribs) |
(Thanks, Dre.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
::Won't discussions increase your chances of being permablocked under the new rule, Ed. [[User:RDre|RDre]] 14:30, 11 April 2007 (EDT) | ::Won't discussions increase your chances of being permablocked under the new rule, Ed. [[User:RDre|RDre]] 14:30, 11 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::<chuckle> I'll just have to take that chance. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:32, 11 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
umm, that already happened when homo sapiens was included. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 14:28, 11 April 2007 (EDT) | umm, that already happened when homo sapiens was included. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 14:28, 11 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:32, April 11, 2007
Don't even think of categorizing human beings here. That is a matter which must be discussed and agreed upon first. --Ed Poor 14:27, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
- Won't discussions increase your chances of being permablocked under the new rule, Ed. RDre 14:30, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
- <chuckle> I'll just have to take that chance. --Ed Poor 14:32, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
umm, that already happened when homo sapiens was included. Flippin 14:28, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
Human beings clearly are primates. As God made them. --Jeremiah4-22 14:31, 11 April 2007 (EDT)