Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,495
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 341:
Line 341: + +
→More Church/State stuff: response
:This is good stuff, Rob, but I think you can see know that our task is almost hopeless at this point. We should first define and explain the building blocks before trying to describe the architecture of the building (let alone try to account for the twisted mess of debris resulting from the building's collapse. ;-) Do you know anything about [[Hellenism]] or [[Hebraism]]? How about the [[Renaissance]] and the [[Reformation]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:09, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
:This is good stuff, Rob, but I think you can see know that our task is almost hopeless at this point. We should first define and explain the building blocks before trying to describe the architecture of the building (let alone try to account for the twisted mess of debris resulting from the building's collapse. ;-) Do you know anything about [[Hellenism]] or [[Hebraism]]? How about the [[Renaissance]] and the [[Reformation]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:09, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
::The problem is I don't subscribe to any of this garbage; I do not beleive all politcal views, actions and groups are ideologically driven. And it can be proven, as Redblue says, the theory is not all encompassing, and frequently falls down. I don't see any more value to ascribe a person or group as left or right than beleiving the human species walked on all fours at one time. To me they are both bizarre theories that each and everyone of us has the persoanl freedom to either accept or reject. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:23, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
==Definition STILL needed==
==Definition STILL needed==