Difference between revisions of "Talk:Presidential debates 2012"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::That's not what i think at all, don't put words in my mouth. But many conservatives, including this website, see Romney as a RINO. Conservatives who are not thrilled about Romney may well not see his election as "good" in its own right. Analyzing in terms of advantages and disadvantages is far more professional, and doesn't assume that a RINO is "good." [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:47, 13 September 2012 (EDT) | ::That's not what i think at all, don't put words in my mouth. But many conservatives, including this website, see Romney as a RINO. Conservatives who are not thrilled about Romney may well not see his election as "good" in its own right. Analyzing in terms of advantages and disadvantages is far more professional, and doesn't assume that a RINO is "good." [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:47, 13 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
Also, a moderator's dietary choices are irrelevant, and calling someone an "affirmative action recipient" without evidence looks petty. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:53, 13 September 2012 (EDT) | Also, a moderator's dietary choices are irrelevant, and calling someone an "affirmative action recipient" without evidence looks petty. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:53, 13 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Romney is obviously a RINO, but that doesn't mean that 4 more years of BHO wouldn't be a complete disaster. Why are you reverting my entire edit if your gripes are just nit picking? Fix it if you have problems with it. The biases of the moderators is vitally important and your eagerness to censor the information is telling. [[User:CraigF2|CraigF2]] 15:05, 13 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:05, September 13, 2012
Ideologies of various moderators, "the good/the bad."
RE: the moderators--people interested in the political leanings of those individuals can read the relevant articles. Re: the Good/ the Bad: some conservatives might not see Romney as "the Good" just because he is running for the GOP, therefore I've rephrased into less tendentious language. MattyD 20:15, 12 September 2012 (EDT)
- This is CONSERVAPEDIA not the New York Times. If you think Barack Hussein Obama winning this upcoming election isn't a bad thing you are so far gone that speaking with you is pointless. 13:55, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
- That's not what i think at all, don't put words in my mouth. But many conservatives, including this website, see Romney as a RINO. Conservatives who are not thrilled about Romney may well not see his election as "good" in its own right. Analyzing in terms of advantages and disadvantages is far more professional, and doesn't assume that a RINO is "good." MattyD 14:47, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
Also, a moderator's dietary choices are irrelevant, and calling someone an "affirmative action recipient" without evidence looks petty. MattyD 14:53, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
- Romney is obviously a RINO, but that doesn't mean that 4 more years of BHO wouldn't be a complete disaster. Why are you reverting my entire edit if your gripes are just nit picking? Fix it if you have problems with it. The biases of the moderators is vitally important and your eagerness to censor the information is telling. CraigF2 15:05, 13 September 2012 (EDT)