Difference between revisions of "Tools of censorship"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* cherry-picking to present only one point of view | * cherry-picking to present only one point of view | ||
* self-censorship by institutions, normally carried out by liberals in positions of authority and influence within the organization - particularly in the [[Lamestream media]] | * self-censorship by institutions, normally carried out by liberals in positions of authority and influence within the organization - particularly in the [[Lamestream media]] | ||
| + | * Censorship via obfuscation. The act of making a work so obscure, that the public does not know about it. This however, may backfire, as demostrated in the [[Streisand effect]] | ||
(add more) | (add more) | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Censorship]] |
Revision as of 00:13, October 1, 2012
Tools of censorship are devices used primarily by liberals to exclude disliked ideologies and to promote close-mindedness. Examples include:
- misusing copyright law to silence the other side and deprive the public of another point of view
- feigning offense to silence the other side and prevent it from praying or criticizing liberal dogma
- claiming that the Constitution requires a wall of separation of church and state to exclude anything religious from schools
- excessive name-calling in order to bully the other side into silence
- boycotts of businesses, such as Chick-Fil-A, that don't follow the their agenda
- cherry-picking to present only one point of view
- self-censorship by institutions, normally carried out by liberals in positions of authority and influence within the organization - particularly in the Lamestream media
- Censorship via obfuscation. The act of making a work so obscure, that the public does not know about it. This however, may backfire, as demostrated in the Streisand effect
(add more)