Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fu'kushima"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Could an exception not be made for [f u kushima] given that it is obviously not spam ! It looks a bit stupid having the article like this [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] | Could an exception not be made for [f u kushima] given that it is obviously not spam ! It looks a bit stupid having the article like this [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] | ||
| − | * I agree! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 10:11, 23 October 2012 (EDT) | + | :* I agree! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 10:11, 23 October 2012 (EDT) |
Revision as of 14:12, October 23, 2012
F u k u s h i m a
"Fu-kushima" or "F u k u s h i m a" is just in this case Fukushima because of Spam Filter. --Joaquín Martínez 09:18, 16 March 2011 (EDT)
- Good morning, perhaps instead of inserting spaces, we could just use a different romanization system. Instead of using Hepburn-shiki romanization system, we could use Kunrei-siki and rename the article Hukusima. JoshDH 17:14, 2 May 2011 (EDT)
- Hukusima in not known. Thanks anyway. --Joaquín Martínez 17:50, 2 May 2011 (EDT)
Spam Filter
Could an exception not be made for [f u kushima] given that it is obviously not spam ! It looks a bit stupid having the article like this Dvergne
- I agree! --Joaquín Martínez 10:11, 23 October 2012 (EDT)