Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gospel of John"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Agree, accepted ''without question'' is just wrong) |
Rob Pommer (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*I agree, and have added a cited source to that effect. Accepted ''without question'' is just wrong. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:57, 12 April 2007 (EDT) | *I agree, and have added a cited source to that effect. Accepted ''without question'' is just wrong. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:57, 12 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I was going for "concise" so I left out some...scholarly stuff that was/is better off left in; but given the aire of the place lately I also did not want to be seen as "questioning" the authenticity of the Bible. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Yes, please do feel free to edit away! [[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 09:07, 12 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:07, April 12, 2007
In "The Apostle John is accepted without question as the author of the Fourth Gospel.", who does the accepting? It isn't "everybody" as even the most cursory search will show; see for instance [1] and [2]. Even if the Apostle John is the author, there are people who don't accept that and/or question it. --Jtl 05:11, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
- I agree, and have added a cited source to that effect. Accepted without question is just wrong. Dpbsmith 05:57, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
- I was going for "concise" so I left out some...scholarly stuff that was/is better off left in; but given the aire of the place lately I also did not want to be seen as "questioning" the authenticity of the Bible.