Difference between revisions of "Talk:Boudicca"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(keep it.) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Boudicca and her revolt gets entire books in Tacitus - why should CP be any different? She definitely needs her own article.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 11:37, 12 April 2007 (EDT) | : Boudicca and her revolt gets entire books in Tacitus - why should CP be any different? She definitely needs her own article.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 11:37, 12 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | agreed she was a monster. maybe you could mention her breifly in the Celts article with a link but she needs her own article. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 12:05, 12 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:05, April 12, 2007
Ed, I think she does deserve some independent mention. She led one of the most successful revolts against the Roman Empire. I think it ranks up there with the slave uprising of Spartacus and Vercingetorix's Gallic revolt. Killing off four Legions is no small success.--Dave3172 11:33, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
- Boudicca and her revolt gets entire books in Tacitus - why should CP be any different? She definitely needs her own article.-AmesGyo! 11:37, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
agreed she was a monster. maybe you could mention her breifly in the Celts article with a link but she needs her own article. --Will N. 12:05, 12 April 2007 (EDT)