679
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 309:
Line 309: + + Line 343:
Line 345: + +
→Fairness
::*Food for thought. I wonder why PF and Ed Poor want this "disposed of", rammed down everyone's throats so quickly? Did someone start a clock I am unaware of? --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 15:23, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
::*Food for thought. I wonder why PF and Ed Poor want this "disposed of", rammed down everyone's throats so quickly? Did someone start a clock I am unaware of? --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 15:23, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
:::It is my policy to stamp out this kind of revisionism the minute I've seen it. I react in a similar manner to Holocaust revisionism. Doesn't it embarrass either of you in the slightest that the only way you can defend your absurd premise that the Nazis were leftists is by claiming that the WR didn't end until 1939, that Henry Luce would have fired reporters for calling the Nazis "right wing," and that Luce was part of some vast left-wing conspiracy (one that apparently included that wild-eyed commie, Henry Ford) to label the Nazis as leftists instead? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 12:24, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Ed's raised some good points, and we need some time to digest them. My own view is this page should be moved to [[Political spectrum theory]] and stood side by side with [[Theory of Evolution]]. Both date roughly from the same era, both have been misapplied in American public schools for more than century, and the resolution of both ultimately is same--they are only theories that each and every one of us individually have the freedom to embrace or reject. But to pass off either as an unchallengeable doctrinal truth just makes no sense anymore in the modern world. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:37, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Ed's raised some good points, and we need some time to digest them. My own view is this page should be moved to [[Political spectrum theory]] and stood side by side with [[Theory of Evolution]]. Both date roughly from the same era, both have been misapplied in American public schools for more than century, and the resolution of both ultimately is same--they are only theories that each and every one of us individually have the freedom to embrace or reject. But to pass off either as an unchallengeable doctrinal truth just makes no sense anymore in the modern world. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:37, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
::The problem is I don't subscribe to any of this garbage; I do not beleive all politcal views, actions and groups are ideologically driven. And it can be proven, as Redblue says, the theory is not all encompassing, and frequently falls down. I don't see any more value to ascribe a person or group as left or right than beleiving the human species walked on all fours at one time. To me they are both bizarre theories that each and everyone of us has the personal freedom to either accept or reject. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:23, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
::The problem is I don't subscribe to any of this garbage; I do not beleive all politcal views, actions and groups are ideologically driven. And it can be proven, as Redblue says, the theory is not all encompassing, and frequently falls down. I don't see any more value to ascribe a person or group as left or right than beleiving the human species walked on all fours at one time. To me they are both bizarre theories that each and everyone of us has the personal freedom to either accept or reject. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:23, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Do you subscribe to calling Red "red," blue "blue," Yellow "yellow," etc? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 12:24, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
==Definition STILL needed==
==Definition STILL needed==