Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,396
edits
Changes
mLine 6:
Line 6: + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Secular Humanism moved to Talk:Secular humanism: conventions
====Why the rv of 17:24, 13 March 2007 ====
====Why the rv of 17:24, 13 March 2007 ====
I didn't see how that edit was ''wrong''? [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 17:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
I didn't see how that edit was ''wrong''? [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 17:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
I have nothing against yours. I just think the article was way too polemic and makes us look bad, so I thought we should start from scratch. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:39, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
::Okay, though it wasn't my edit. [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 17:41, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
==About the definition==
Secular Humanist is not against religion. Rather, humanism is an ideology emphasizing the value of the human experience and interpretation of the world over more organized, "top-down" forms of religion. Thus, secular humanism is a brand of humanism that deemphasizes the importance of creeds, in order to focus on the shared aspects of humanity.
Note:
1. Secular humanists do not hate or conspire to overthrow religion.
2. Secular humanists are not required to hold ACLU memberships, nor do they engage in clandestine devil-worship.
3. Attack pages created to denounce various ideologies are not representative of encyclopedic content, nor do they reflect well on Conservapedia.