Changes

m
Line 22: Line 22:  
There are many exceptions to this procedure.  First, although this requirement is a law, the Speaker of the [[US House of Representatives]] ruled in 1975 that limits on backdoor spending can be waived if the House adopts a recommendation to do so from the House Rules Committee.<ref>121 Cong. Rec. 7677, 94th Cong. 1st Sess., Mar. 20, 1975 (ruling by Speaker Carl Albert [Okla.]).</ref> Second, it applies only to consideration of new spending after 1975. Third, broad categories involving gifts and trust funds were exempt.<ref>2 U.S.C. § 651(c)</ref>
 
There are many exceptions to this procedure.  First, although this requirement is a law, the Speaker of the [[US House of Representatives]] ruled in 1975 that limits on backdoor spending can be waived if the House adopts a recommendation to do so from the House Rules Committee.<ref>121 Cong. Rec. 7677, 94th Cong. 1st Sess., Mar. 20, 1975 (ruling by Speaker Carl Albert [Okla.]).</ref> Second, it applies only to consideration of new spending after 1975. Third, broad categories involving gifts and trust funds were exempt.<ref>2 U.S.C. § 651(c)</ref>
   −
===Further efforts to limit backdoor authority==
+
===Further efforts to limit backdoor authority===
 
In 1990, the Congress further attempted to limit backdoor authority by
 
In 1990, the Congress further attempted to limit backdoor authority by
 
establishing controls over changes in [[direct spending]]—spending that is
 
establishing controls over changes in [[direct spending]]—spending that is
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,275

edits