Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hydroplate Theory"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
''"Brown estimates that one percent of this water, together with vast quantities of mud and rock, achieved escape speed and persists today as comets, asteroids, meteoroids, and the ice deposits that have already been demonstrated on the Moon, the planet Mercury, and most recently on the planet Mars."'' | ''"Brown estimates that one percent of this water, together with vast quantities of mud and rock, achieved escape speed and persists today as comets, asteroids, meteoroids, and the ice deposits that have already been demonstrated on the Moon, the planet Mercury, and most recently on the planet Mars."'' | ||
Just wondering how Brown made this estimate - I couldn't find it in the reference but there's a lot to read through and it was late when I looked. From what I've been reading, even just the water on Mars is significantly more than than this amount (there's actually surprisingly little water on Earth) so how can we actually claim which extraterrestrial waters are flood waters? [[User:RyanFT|RyanFT]] 14:44, 20 February 2013 (EST) | Just wondering how Brown made this estimate - I couldn't find it in the reference but there's a lot to read through and it was late when I looked. From what I've been reading, even just the water on Mars is significantly more than than this amount (there's actually surprisingly little water on Earth) so how can we actually claim which extraterrestrial waters are flood waters? [[User:RyanFT|RyanFT]] 14:44, 20 February 2013 (EST) | ||
| + | :If there's no objection I think I'll remove either the 1% claim or extraterrestrial waters claim - they seem to be mutually exclusive [[User:RyanFT|RyanFT]] 08:24, 22 February 2013 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:24, February 22, 2013
One Percent
"Brown estimates that one percent of this water, together with vast quantities of mud and rock, achieved escape speed and persists today as comets, asteroids, meteoroids, and the ice deposits that have already been demonstrated on the Moon, the planet Mercury, and most recently on the planet Mars." Just wondering how Brown made this estimate - I couldn't find it in the reference but there's a lot to read through and it was late when I looked. From what I've been reading, even just the water on Mars is significantly more than than this amount (there's actually surprisingly little water on Earth) so how can we actually claim which extraterrestrial waters are flood waters? RyanFT 14:44, 20 February 2013 (EST)
- If there's no objection I think I'll remove either the 1% claim or extraterrestrial waters claim - they seem to be mutually exclusive RyanFT 08:24, 22 February 2013 (EST)