Difference between revisions of "User talk:DanAP"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
I was wondering if we really need both articles as to the SA. The Brownshirts article is much more detailed and mention of the term, storm troopers can be pointed out therein. What do you think? Cheers, --[[User:JohnJustice|JohnJustice]] 23:37, 26 February 2013 (EST)
 
I was wondering if we really need both articles as to the SA. The Brownshirts article is much more detailed and mention of the term, storm troopers can be pointed out therein. What do you think? Cheers, --[[User:JohnJustice|JohnJustice]] 23:37, 26 February 2013 (EST)
−
PS: I just found where there is another short article [[Brown Shirts]] which we don't need for sure. Cheers, --[[User:JohnJustice|JohnJustice]] 23:42, 26 February 2013 (EST)
+
:PS: I just found where there is another short article [[Brown Shirts]] which we don't need. Cheers, --[[User:JohnJustice|JohnJustice]] 23:42, 26 February 2013 (EST)

Revision as of 04:43, February 27, 2013

G'day Dan...thanks for your action on RogerMoo.

If you highlight the words on an article that should be deleted, right click, hit "delete" then type Spam within {{ }} on the now empty page, the action will automatically appear on Recent Changes for Admins to see and act upon.

Cheers AlanE 18:01, 13 February 2013 (EST)

Teamword

Hi, Dan. Thanks for the quick response to my request at talk:team. --Ed Poor Talk 08:38, 22 February 2013 (EST)

Brownshirts and Storm Troopers

Hello DanAP:

I was wondering if we really need both articles as to the SA. The Brownshirts article is much more detailed and mention of the term, storm troopers can be pointed out therein. What do you think? Cheers, --JohnJustice 23:37, 26 February 2013 (EST)

PS: I just found where there is another short article Brown Shirts which we don't need. Cheers, --JohnJustice 23:42, 26 February 2013 (EST)