Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dave07"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
::::You have no right to be heard '''here''' though.  Why on earth would you think the first amendment applied to this website?  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 21:44, 28 February 2013 (EST)
 
::::You have no right to be heard '''here''' though.  Why on earth would you think the first amendment applied to this website?  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 21:44, 28 February 2013 (EST)
 
:::::Thank-you for your consideration, but the server prevented my response.  If this is America, which this website acts like it is, than the First Amendment should apply here.  I am a U.S. citizen, I am not in Iran or Sudan, I am not talking about their governments, I should have a right to express my opinion in a non-violent manner.  I do believe that I am being less violent than your rather impetuous insults; they are almost dehumanizing.  [[User:Dave07|Dave07]] 22:49, 28 February 2013 (EST)
 
:::::Thank-you for your consideration, but the server prevented my response.  If this is America, which this website acts like it is, than the First Amendment should apply here.  I am a U.S. citizen, I am not in Iran or Sudan, I am not talking about their governments, I should have a right to express my opinion in a non-violent manner.  I do believe that I am being less violent than your rather impetuous insults; they are almost dehumanizing.  [[User:Dave07|Dave07]] 22:49, 28 February 2013 (EST)
 +
::::::I am not a US citizen, and I still have no idea why you think that the first amendment would apply to a private site that sets up its own rules of conduct.  The First Amendment begins "Congress shall make no laws ... " and is totally irrelevant to this websites rules.  I should add that there are things in articles here that I do not agree with, but that I accept that this site has a declared POV and by remaining here I agree to not add things that contradict this POV, at least not in mainspace articles.  I suggest you accept this also.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 22:53, 28 February 2013 (EST)

Revision as of 03:53, March 1, 2013

If you wish to make changes that significantly alter the nature and meaning of the articles I suggest you bring it up on the talk pages first. --DamianJohn 20:00, 28 February 2013 (EST)

I have a right to be right. Dave07 21:16, 28 February 2013 (EST)
Indeed, but you have no right to be heard. --DamianJohn 21:20, 28 February 2013 (EST)
It is extremely ironic how much you seem to love the Constitution when you clearly don't understand the First Amendment. I have as much of a right to be heard as you do. You tend to think I just actually agree with you and don't, but that is a misconception. I do not lie about philosophy.
You have no right to be heard here though. Why on earth would you think the first amendment applied to this website? --DamianJohn 21:44, 28 February 2013 (EST)
Thank-you for your consideration, but the server prevented my response. If this is America, which this website acts like it is, than the First Amendment should apply here. I am a U.S. citizen, I am not in Iran or Sudan, I am not talking about their governments, I should have a right to express my opinion in a non-violent manner. I do believe that I am being less violent than your rather impetuous insults; they are almost dehumanizing. Dave07 22:49, 28 February 2013 (EST)
I am not a US citizen, and I still have no idea why you think that the first amendment would apply to a private site that sets up its own rules of conduct. The First Amendment begins "Congress shall make no laws ... " and is totally irrelevant to this websites rules. I should add that there are things in articles here that I do not agree with, but that I accept that this site has a declared POV and by remaining here I agree to not add things that contradict this POV, at least not in mainspace articles. I suggest you accept this also. --DamianJohn 22:53, 28 February 2013 (EST)