Difference between revisions of "User:DonnyC/sandbox"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(archive)
(Undo revision 1049537 by DonnyC (talk))
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
User:Conservative stalks editors around the internet: ''[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AMain_Page&action=historysubmit&diff=1035766&oldid=1035743 NKeaton, you wrote on another website: "I am a proud first generation Irish Catholic man, the brother of a Jesuit priest, and the kin of at least one Jesuit or Opus Dei priest per generation for many years."  I can attest to you being proud. You know what the Bible says about being proud, don't you?]"''
 
User:Conservative stalks editors around the internet: ''[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AMain_Page&action=historysubmit&diff=1035766&oldid=1035743 NKeaton, you wrote on another website: "I am a proud first generation Irish Catholic man, the brother of a Jesuit priest, and the kin of at least one Jesuit or Opus Dei priest per generation for many years."  I can attest to you being proud. You know what the Bible says about being proud, don't you?]"''
−
 
−
'''Things Not to be Seen:'''
 
−
 
−
Why have you protected this article conservative ? Please unlock it. Do you not understand the concept of collaboration ??? Maybe you should look it up in a dictionary as you clearly don't know what it means ! [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 07:18, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::I understand the concept of collaboration. And I do not wish to collaborate with another sockpuppet of Fergus Mason! When Fergus Mason debates VivaYehshua on the [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions] for evolutionists instead of making arrangements to debate him and then not showing up, then I will collaborate with him, but not before then! Why is the obscure evolutionist Fergus Mason so afraid of debating VivaYehshua?  Is he afraid of losing the debate very badly?  I do think it is humorous that Fergus Mason arranged for a debate with VivaYehshua and then backed down like a timid, little bunny! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 11:34, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::According to his comments at the other wiki Fergus Mason talks to Vivayeshua regularly; he says Vivayeshua isn't interested in the QE! campaign and would rather discuss other things. Personally I think you're just giving him publicity. --[[User:SamuelFC|SamuelFC]] 12:32, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::::I spoke to VivaYehshua personally and he said the [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists] were good questions and he is still willing to debate Fergus Mason. He also told me that Fergus Mason didn't show up for their debate. When is the obscure evolutionists Fergus Mason going to man-up and debate VivaYehshua on the 15 questions for evolutionists?  Is Fergus afraid of losing the debate very badly? I know this is the case! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:47, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::::Well, it's your word against his, and whatever else can be said about Fergus Mason he's not afraid to give his real name. --[[User:SamuelFC|SamuelFC]] 12:48, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::::::Evolutionists have a track record of losing debates. See: [[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]].  Fergus Mason is like [[DonExodus2]].  He made a creation vs. evolution debate arrangement and then didn't show up because he evolved into a chicken! Now every time I see his name, I brings me a little mirth. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:57, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::::::He just left a message on my RW user page. He says he turned up for the debate but was blocked by another mod. --[[User:SamuelFC|SamuelFC]] 12:58, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::::::::I believe VivaYehshua over Fergus Mason. Let Mr. Mason make a public announcement to VivaYehshua accepting the debate offer given to him via a prominent evolutionist YouTube channel and then follow through with the debate. Then Fergus Mason will have more credibility with me, but not before then. Right now, I see Fergus Mason as just one of the many timorous evolutionist posers who lacks conviction and he is afraid to debate. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:05, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::::::::::Well, he says he gets blocked instantly whenever he signs in to Shock's chatroom. He also says you should ask Shadapple about it. --[[User:SamuelFC|SamuelFC]] 13:09, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::::::::::Let Fergus Mason publicly accept the debate offer given to him on the 15 questions for evolutionists via an announcement on [[Thunderf00t]]'s YouTube channel or some other prominent evolutionist YouTube channel. Unless of course, he is afraid to do so! I am not going to waste my time pursuing the lame excuses and wild goose chases of evolutionist weasels!  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:19, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::::::::::::He says he ''has'' accepted the offer but can't debate if he's blocked, which I have to say makes sense. He also says he's happy to debate ''you'' but he thinks you'll refuse. --[[User:SamuelFC|SamuelFC]] 13:24, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::::::::::::And he just added, "Now wait for the excuses to start." --[[User:SamuelFC|SamuelFC]] 13:25, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::::::::::::::OK, he says he's happy to have a written debate with you about the 15 questions. He says just let him back into Conservapedia and you can start right away. --[[User:SamuelFC|SamuelFC]] 13:44, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::::::::::::::Or he'll debate you at Ameriwiki. I'm willing to let you both sign up as long as you guarantee there won't be any vandalism of other articles. --[[User:SamuelFC|SamuelFC]] 13:47, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
Fergus Mason is an obscure evolutionist who backed out of his debate with VivaYehshua. He is cowardly and obscure evolutionist.  Fergus Mason must first prove himself by going through the VivaYehshua/Shockofgod concertina wire while being peppered with the 15 questions for evolutionists before I would even consider debating a little known, evolutionist laughingstock like him.  We all know that VivaYehshua would grind up his pathetic evolutionary "arguments" into a fine pulp and embarrass him and that is why he backed out of his debate with VivaYehshua. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:14, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:Actually he said an hour ago you'd claim he's obscure. He asked me to remind you who uses their real name. --[[User:SamuelFC|SamuelFC]] 14:17, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::OK, he says he accepted the debate with Viva but is blocked from Shock's chatroom. Shock's mods do have a reputation for blocking people, so I don't disbelieve him unless you can prove me wrong. He also says he'll debate you, right now. The way it looks to me it's ''you'' who's backing out, not him. --[[User:SamuelFC|SamuelFC]] 14:20, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::Fergus, contact [[Shockofgod]] through his YouTube channel, blog or Twitter channel to set up the debate. Stop making pathetic excuses and man up! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:40, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::::At least three of Shock's mods, plus Shock himself, block me on sight. However, seeing as we're both here, why won't ''you'' debate me? And let's not have any of this "Fergus Mason, an obscure evolutionist" drivel. I'm a lot less obscure than ''you'' are, Mr Anonymous Blogger.--[[User:FergusM|FergusM]] 15:43, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
 
−
::::: ???? Why would you accuse me of being a sock of this Fergus fellow ? I don't go around accusing that others are socks. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 17:14, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::::::Because he'll do ''anything'' rather than actually get involved in one of these "creation v. evolution" debates that seem to mean so much to him. As this discussion has hopefully demonstrated. ''This'', Conservapedians, is what your sysops are like. Blowhards who call ''me'' a coward because I won't debate ''someone else''. If "Conservative" was a real man he'd have debated me himself when he had the chance, but he got me blocked then pranced about in a chorus of triumphant squeaks. Read it and weep.--[[User:FWilliamM|FWilliamM]] 20:58, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
== Open your Mail Page ==
 
−
 
−
It's good to see you are no longer in your bunny hole. Now the next step is to open up a channel of communication, such as ''unlocking your talk page''. Just some helpful hints on being a successful wiki user. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 13:29, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::Successful wiki user?  Are you the person I should learn from? A wiki user whose effeminate edits lack machismo due to your poor choices on the highway of love!  Brendon, no major newspapers have quoted your articles because they lack ma-cheese-mo! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:54, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::I searched, and can't find any case where a major publication cited '''you''' in a positive way. As for effeminacy... 0.o?  [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 14:05, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::Back to a productive conversation, I highly recommend you open a channel of communication, as it is required by the CP commandments. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 14:16, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::The ''Chicago Tribune'' which used to endorse Republicans routinely quoted my evolution article in a objective and neutral way. The liberal newspapers have whined about my articles, but never pointed out a single factual error in them! Brendon, given that you are such a successful wiki editor, what newspapers have quoted or cited your work? 
 
−
 
−
::By the way, a conservative woman with a doctorate cited my work! Conservative ladies love my articles! They shout "Olé! Olé! Olé!" while reading all of my articles! :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:25, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::That's good. Do you have a link to these cites? I'd like to read what they said. --[[User:SamuelFC|SamuelFC]] 14:26, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::::Olé, Olé, Olé! Now lets see the links. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 14:27, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::::Every publication that's linked to Conservative's pet articles says they're demented. He isn't going to show you any links.--[[User:FergusM|FergusM]] 15:10, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Written debate on the 15 Questions for Evolutionists ==
 
−
[[File:Señor-Dawkins-in-his-intellectual-bunnyhole.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|[[User:Conservative]]]]
 
−
Hi, Conservative! I'm all ready to debate you on your 15 Questions. Are ''you'' ready? Or are there some fresh carrots tempting you back down your little intellectual hole?
 
−
 
−
Time to put up or shut up. If you want your questions debated do it ''now''. --[[User:FergusM|FergusM]] 14:38, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:No? Scared to debate me ''right now''? Oh well. I'm sure everybody will draw their own conclusions from that. Thanks for all the mentions on your blog though. It's generating me quite a lot of business.--[[User:FergusM|FergusM]] 14:46, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Still nothing? If you're not willing to debate yourself it seems a bit hypocritical of you to call other people cowards for not debating, wouldn't you say?--[[User:FergusM|FergusM]] 15:08, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::*Crickets*
 
−
Fergus Mason, first follow though with your creation vs. evolution debate on the 15 questions for evolutionists that you backed out of with VivaYehshua. 
 
−
 
−
As far as I am concerned, you are an obscure evolutionist who backed out of his debate with VivaYehshua. Fergus, face the facts - you are a cowardly and obscure evolutionist.  Fergus, you must first prove yourself by going through the VivaYehshua/Shockofgod concertina wire while being peppered with the 15 questions for evolutionists before I would even consider debating a little known, evolutionist laughingstock like you.  We all know that VivaYehshua would grind up your pathetic evolutionary "arguments" into a fine pulp and embarrass you and that is why you backed out of you debate with VivaYehshua.
 
−
 
−
Fergus, first socks, then shoes. "He who is faithful in a very little thing is faithful also in much; and he who is unrighteous in a very little thing is unrighteous also in much." - Jesus.  You know what you must do now Fergus.  I suggest doing it or continue to live in shame. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:30, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:I didn't back out; I turned up and instantly got banned by that moron Shadapple. Pretty hard to debate when you're blocked, isn't it?
 
−
 
−
:Anyway, Mr Oh-So-Not-Obscure (what's your name/gender/quantity again?) I'd rather debate YOU. Are you up for it or do you prefer to have other people do your fighting for you? Stop bleating and accept the challenge you've been throwing around so freely. This is your big chance to show your debating skills; now either use it or stop the nonsense. We all ''know'' you're scared to debate me, but you can prove us wrong if you have the machismo. Personally I don't expect you to, but hey, I've been wrong before.
 
−
 
−
:Now, are you going to debate me or get back down your hole and tuck into some nice lettuce with Flopsy, Mopsy and Cottontail? --[[User:FergusM|FergusM]] 15:36, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::Fergus Mason, contact Shockofgod through his YouTube channel, blog or Twitter page. Stop making excuses and man up! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:42, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::Ken, it is YOU that's making excuses, not me. Are you going to debate me or not? If you're scared just say so and enjoy your salad. Otherwise <big><big><big>PUT UP OR SHUT UP.</big></big></big>--[[User:FergusM|FergusM]] 15:45, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
I'm going to cook dinner. I'd say you have about half an hour to decide if you're the great debater you always claim to be or just some gutless weasel who hangs around the back squeaking, "Hey, why don't you and him fight?" Up to you, but everybody reading this is going to draw their own conclusions from your response. You've been issuing debate challenges about your 15 idiotic questions for a year; well, here's your chance to show how devastating they are to evolution. Take it if you're man enough. Otherwise I'll be dancing with the Hispanic ladies tonight while you eat carrots. It's decision time. Don't mess up, now.--[[User:FergusM|FergusM]] 15:56, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:Fergus, your big letters do not impress me, little man. You know what to do to remove your shame. Remember, Fergus: First socks then shoes.  Follow through on your first 15 questions for evolutionist debate commitment with VivaYehshua instead of backing down.  "He who is faithful in a very little thing is faithful also in much; and he who is unrighteous in a very little thing is unrighteous also in much." - Jesus. 
 
−
 
−
:Fergus, if you were to man up and follow though with the debate you backed down from, then you might have a long haired sweetheart who was willing to cook delicious and wholesome foods for you (I am assuming that after you lost the debate hands down you would become a biblical creationist and enter a realm filled with long haired sweethearts!). Instead, you have to settle for cooking for yourself a TV dinner! Such a sad state of affairs. I feel sorry for you, Fergus. Do the right thing and follow through with the debate that you agreed to do with VivaYehshua. You will be glad you did. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:03, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::Nice one, weasel. Get me blocked then launch your abusive screed against me. Epic fail. Debate me, Ken, or STFU.
 
−
 
−
:::By the way, numbnuts, I ''have'' a "sweetheart." She doesn't cook for me, though, because unlike you she has a job. ''We'' cook for ''each other'', depending on who has the time. And I don't even know what a TV dinner is. Maybe it's something familiar only to American cellar dwellers like you. You coward.--[[User:FWilliamM|FWilliamM]] 20:54, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::Oh, he's blocked. Well there's a surprise... --[[User:SamuelFC|SamuelFC]] 16:17, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::However if you're willing to debate him I'll let you do it on Ameriwiki. If you're not, well, not all of us have the courage to identify ourselves and accept a challenge. It doesn't make you a bad person, just a timid one. --[[User:SamuelFC|SamuelFC]] 16:19, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
::::I may be mistaken, but I don't see FergusM in the block log. Maybe he is too busy laundering his apron to respond! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:48, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 
−
:::::Good point. You could always ask SamuelFC what exactly he's talking about. Oh wait, he's been blocked. --[[User:DonnyC|DonnyC]] 22:01, 26 April 2013 (EDT)
 

Revision as of 05:49, April 28, 2013

Various predictions:

Give it up, liberals: the next Pope is likely to be Cardinal Arinze, an African leader as conservative as Conservapedia. [1]

Behavior:

User:Conservative stalks editors around the internet: NKeaton, you wrote on another website: "I am a proud first generation Irish Catholic man, the brother of a Jesuit priest, and the kin of at least one Jesuit or Opus Dei priest per generation for many years." I can attest to you being proud. You know what the Bible says about being proud, don't you?"

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:DonnyC/sandbox&oldid=1049540"