Difference between revisions of "Theory"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Everyone wants to know whether a given "theory" is "scientific" or not.)
(physical science does not encompass all science, and we cannot say the number theory is outside of science - is math "unscientific"?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A '''theory''' is an explanation.
 
A '''theory''' is an explanation.
  
 +
*In layman’s terms, if something is said to be “just a theory,” it usually means that it is a mere guess, or is unproved. It might even lack credibility. But in scientific terms, a theory implies that something has been proven and is generally accepted as being true. [http://wilstar.com/theories.htm]
  
−
*In layman’s terms, if something is said to be “just a theory,” it usually means that it is a mere guess, or is unproved. It might even lack credibility. But in scientific terms, a theory implies that something has been proven and is generally accepted as being true. [http://wilstar.com/theories.htm]
+
The term "theory" is often used outside of the realm of [[physical science]], such as in [[music theory]], [[number theory]], or [[Marxist theory]].  
  
 +
==Scientific Theory==
 +
A theory
 
See:
 
See:
 
*[[scientific theory]]
 
*[[scientific theory]]

Revision as of 22:16, April 13, 2007

A theory is an explanation.

  • In layman’s terms, if something is said to be “just a theory,” it usually means that it is a mere guess, or is unproved. It might even lack credibility. But in scientific terms, a theory implies that something has been proven and is generally accepted as being true. [1]

The term "theory" is often used outside of the realm of physical science, such as in music theory, number theory, or Marxist theory.

Scientific Theory

A theory See: