Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,743
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: − + + +
no edit summary
One, held by [[Creationism|creationists]], is that life originated divinely/[[supernatural]]ly.
One, held by [[Creationism|creationists]], is that life originated divinely/[[supernatural]]ly.
The other school of thought is that non-life became life solely by means of natural processes. This is commonly referred to as ''abiogenesis'' and "chemical [[evolution]]".<ref>http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/36/36_4/abiogenesis.html</ref><ref>http://www.creationbc.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=86&Itemid=85</ref>
The other school of thought is that non-life became life solely by means of natural processes. This is commonly referred to as ''abiogenesis'' and "chemical [[evolution]]".<ref>http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/36/36_4/abiogenesis.html</ref><ref>http://www.creationbc.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=86&Itemid=85</ref>
The proposal that first life came about through natural processes has not fared well in recent times.
The proposal that first life came about through natural processes has not fared well in recent times.
High profile evolutionists [[P.Z. Myers]] and Nick Matzke, agree that the [[origin of life]] is part of the [[evolution]]ary [[paradigm]], as does [[Richard Dawkins]].<ref>[http://creation.com/origin-of-life Origin of life]</ref>
== Current status ==
== Current status ==