Changes

I don't propose removing the article but perhaps we don't to link to this page from such a huge number of pages? Perhaps just keep the references where he is most relevant.

I don't propose removing the article but perhaps we don't to link to this page from such a huge number of pages? Perhaps just keep the references where he is most relevant.

::[[Creation Ministries International]] prominently features a [[Shockofgod]] video in the flagship atheism article.[http://creation.com/atheism].  To this day, Shockofgod's question stumps atheists and utterly humiliates the atheist community. And unlike Stephen Hawking, Shockofgod never embarrassed himself by positing that the universe poofed itself into existence from nothing (There is a reason the [[Shockofgod]] article is larger than the Stephen Hawking article - Hawking has never stumped the Christian community, but Shockofgod's question continues to stump atheists. See: [[Essay: The question atheists fear]]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:03, 13 January 2014 (EST)

::[[Creation Ministries International]] prominently features a [[Shockofgod]] video in the flagship atheism article.[http://creation.com/atheism].  To this day, Shockofgod's question stumps atheists and utterly humiliates the atheist community. And unlike Stephen Hawking, Shockofgod never embarrassed himself by positing that the universe poofed itself into existence from nothing (There is a reason the [[Shockofgod]] CP article is larger than the Stephen Hawking CP article - Hawking has never stumped the Christian community, but Shockofgod's question continues to stump atheists. See: [[Essay: The question atheists fear]]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:03, 13 January 2014 (EST)

:::Does it by any chance feature this video[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUmKhEgeo54]--[[User:JerryCa|JerryCa]] 17:01, 13 January 2014 (EST)

:::Does it by any chance feature this video[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUmKhEgeo54]--[[User:JerryCa|JerryCa]] 17:01, 13 January 2014 (EST)

That charge would never standup in court. Shockofgod promoting a redirect to counter attempts to repeatedly shut down his YouTube channel was warranted. The redirect would direct people to his new YouTube channel after atheists attempted to censor him by repeatedly false flagging his YouTube channels. See: [http://creationwiki.org/YouTube_participant_advice#Using_a_URL_redirect_to_stop_false_reporting Using a redirect to thwart atheist censorship].  

That charge would never standup in court. Shockofgod promoting a redirect to counter attempts to repeatedly shut down his YouTube channel was warranted. The redirect would direct people to his new YouTube channel after atheists attempted to censor him by repeatedly false flagging his YouTube channels. See: [http://creationwiki.org/YouTube_participant_advice#Using_a_URL_redirect_to_stop_false_reporting Using a redirect to thwart atheist censorship].  

After embarrassing yourself with this spurious charge, I think you need to redeem yourself at his point and answer Shockofgod's question. And unfortunately for you, this is something that you cannot do. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:19, 13 January 2014 (EST)

After embarrassing yourself with this spurious charge, I think you need to redeem yourself at his point and answer Shockofgod's question. And unfortunately for you, this is something that you cannot do. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:19, 13 January 2014 (EST)