nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 70:
Line 70: + +
→Neutral Evolution: An accumulation of neutral changes?
:Not all neutral drift is macroevolution, but it's still a mechanism that contributes significantly to the process. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 17:33, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
:Not all neutral drift is macroevolution, but it's still a mechanism that contributes significantly to the process. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 17:33, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
::I'll need more convincing than that. A change in hair colour could be no stretch of the imagination be considered '''macro'''evolution. Perhaps the following analogy is bad, but if mutations could be rated according to their impact, some might be negative (-1), some positive (+1), and some neutral (0). An accumulation of neutral changes (0+0+0+0+0+0)... I think you can see where I'm going there. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:13, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
== Conservative what the...!? ==
== Conservative what the...!? ==