Difference between revisions of "Talk:There Are No Atheists In Foxholes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
So has anyone ever heard "'There are no atheists in foxholes' is not an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes?'" I love that line (by the way I'm not an atheist). [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT) I'm also in the Army... | So has anyone ever heard "'There are no atheists in foxholes' is not an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes?'" I love that line (by the way I'm not an atheist). [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT) I'm also in the Army... | ||
| − | I am going to add in here that the Battle of Stalingrad was fought by an explicitly atheistic army. [[User:Basel| | + | I am going to add in here that the Battle of Stalingrad was fought by an explicitly atheistic army. [[User:Basel|Basel]] |
Revision as of 19:36, June 2, 2014
What's the point of this, aside from being an ad homenim attack on atheists? JecklynH 02:03, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
- That IS the point. Jros83 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
So has anyone ever heard "'There are no atheists in foxholes' is not an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes?'" I love that line (by the way I'm not an atheist). Jros83 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT) I'm also in the Army...
I am going to add in here that the Battle of Stalingrad was fought by an explicitly atheistic army. Basel