Difference between revisions of "User talk:AugustO"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==About my revert of your recent edits==
 
==About my revert of your recent edits==
  
−
Your comment did not contribute anything to the discussion at hand. You did not raise any new objections, but merely repeated previous ones. Your previous objections to the translation Mr. Schlafly proposed have already noted by him. Furthermore, that section of the talk page was not so much about whether or not that translation is correct, but about where and how to implement it. Your comment did not belong at that section of the talk page. - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 14:47, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
+
Your comment did not contribute anything to the discussion at hand. You did not raise any new objections, but merely repeated previous ones. Your previous objections to the translation Mr. Schlafly proposed have already noted by him. Furthermore, that section of the talk page was not so much about whether or not that translation is correct, but about where and how to implement it. Your comment did not belong at that section of the talk page. I don't want to sound adversarial, but this is exactly the kind of [[last wordism]] and [[talk pollution]] that's so common at other wikis; Conservapedia seeks to minimize those phenomenons to a zero - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 14:47, 30 June 2014 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:49, June 30, 2014

Useful links


About my revert of your recent edits

Your comment did not contribute anything to the discussion at hand. You did not raise any new objections, but merely repeated previous ones. Your previous objections to the translation Mr. Schlafly proposed have already noted by him. Furthermore, that section of the talk page was not so much about whether or not that translation is correct, but about where and how to implement it. Your comment did not belong at that section of the talk page. I don't want to sound adversarial, but this is exactly the kind of last wordism and talk pollution that's so common at other wikis; Conservapedia seeks to minimize those phenomenons to a zero - PetyrB 14:47, 30 June 2014 (EDT)