Difference between revisions of "Fetus"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Completely one-sided view of usage - need help balancing this section)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
provided the unborn child's head has not emerged from the mother's body (see [[partial-birth abortion]]).  
 
provided the unborn child's head has not emerged from the mother's body (see [[partial-birth abortion]]).  
  
Evangelical Christians dislike the term ''fetus'' being applied to an unborn child, because they view that as oppressive. They prefer to call unborn children simply that, ''children''. They say that those that hold to an abortion viewpoint are taking advantage of those that cannot defend themselves, and calling the unborn child simply a fetus devalues human life.
+
==Usage==
 +
 
 +
Evangelical Christians prefer the term ''unborn child'' to the term ''fetus'' when discussing [[elective abortion]], since the former supports the viewpoint that (1) "Human life begins at [[conception]]" and (2) "[[Abortion]] is [[murder]]". They feel that calling the unborn child simply a "fetus" devalues [[human life]].
  
 
[[Category:Reproduction]]
 
[[Category:Reproduction]]

Revision as of 21:19, April 15, 2007

Fetus1.jpg

The term fetus, as applied to human beings, refers to a conceived but unborn child that has developed beyond an embryonic stage.

In Politics

One of the sharpest divisions in United States politics is over whether human life begins at conception and if so, what this means.

Legally, in most jurisdictions, it is considered permissible to terminate the life of the fetus at any point in the pregnancy (see abortion) provided the unborn child's head has not emerged from the mother's body (see partial-birth abortion).

Usage

Evangelical Christians prefer the term unborn child to the term fetus when discussing elective abortion, since the former supports the viewpoint that (1) "Human life begins at conception" and (2) "Abortion is murder". They feel that calling the unborn child simply a "fetus" devalues human life.