Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tautology"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
From Miriam-Webster, rhetorical tautology is defined as "needless repetition of an idea, statement, or word". | From Miriam-Webster, rhetorical tautology is defined as "needless repetition of an idea, statement, or word". | ||
| − | The triangle example given is not a tautology, but a definition. An example of a rhetorical tautology would be, for instance, a "godless atheist", or a "three-sided triangle" (as opposed to " | + | The triangle example given is not a tautology, but a definition. An example of a rhetorical tautology would be, for instance, a "godless atheist", or a "three-sided triangle" (as opposed to "all triangles have three sides". |
From Dictionary.com, a philosophical tautology is: | From Dictionary.com, a philosophical tautology is: | ||
Revision as of 02:16, April 16, 2007
"Tautology" has two definitions, one philosophical, one rhetorical. The current article confounds the two definitions.
From Miriam-Webster, rhetorical tautology is defined as "needless repetition of an idea, statement, or word".
The triangle example given is not a tautology, but a definition. An example of a rhetorical tautology would be, for instance, a "godless atheist", or a "three-sided triangle" (as opposed to "all triangles have three sides".
From Dictionary.com, a philosophical tautology is: a.a compound propositional form all of whose instances are true, as “A or not A.” b.an instance of such a form, as “This candidate will win or will not win.” Another example is "If it rains, it will rain."