Changes

no edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:  
::::'''Delete'''.  The author doesn't seem to understand the difference between exotheology and the study of extraterestial (sp?) life.  Nevermind the fact that saying alien life is a liberal belief, this article is embarassing to have on the front page.
 
::::'''Delete'''.  The author doesn't seem to understand the difference between exotheology and the study of extraterestial (sp?) life.  Nevermind the fact that saying alien life is a liberal belief, this article is embarassing to have on the front page.
    +
::::: Delete. The article itself reads very confused, and the passing swipe at a 'liberal belief system' speaks for itself. --[[User:Wikinterpreter|Wikinterpreter]]
 
== Keep ==
 
== Keep ==
 
The author explains the title, and has good sources for it. And the article, by whatever title, has a definite place here.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 09:59, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
The author explains the title, and has good sources for it. And the article, by whatever title, has a definite place here.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 09:59, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
: We should document the debate about spending vast amounts of money on the ideological crusade which is SETI. Exobiology isn't science at all. Good on Aschlafly for pointing that out. --[[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 10:26, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
: We should document the debate about spending vast amounts of money on the ideological crusade which is SETI. Exobiology isn't science at all. Good on Aschlafly for pointing that out. --[[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 10:26, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::This is the same argument they made against funding the Columbus expedition.  The bible never mentioned any "new world" [[User:Lambchop|Lambchop]] 10:36, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::This is the same argument they made against funding the Columbus expedition.  The bible never mentioned any "new world" [[User:Lambchop|Lambchop]] 10:36, 16 April 2007 (EDT)