Changes

263 bytes added ,  02:44, April 17, 2007
no edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:     
The argument that criminals would still get guns if they wanted them has some foundation in logic, however, it has no foundation statistically.  A comparison to England will suffice.  It bears out the conclusion that while some criminals still get guns, it is fewer - the mental & physical block of having to break another law just to get a gun actually deters gun crime :-) -'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:42, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
The argument that criminals would still get guns if they wanted them has some foundation in logic, however, it has no foundation statistically.  A comparison to England will suffice.  It bears out the conclusion that while some criminals still get guns, it is fewer - the mental & physical block of having to break another law just to get a gun actually deters gun crime :-) -'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:42, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Allso should be concidered where the criminals get their guns, those dont show up from nowhere. Most are stolen from those who have legally purchased them. Less gun owners, less weapons around to be stolen. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 22:44, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
188

edits