SkipCaptcha
12,693
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 392:
Line 392: − [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 12:48, 30 December 2014 (EST)+ − − + + +
User talk:TheAmericanRedoubt (view source)
Revision as of 18:04, December 30, 2014
, 18:04, December 30, 2014→two matters
:: 3. Thanks for the support on the picture upload rights. I would also like to put time into categorizing the pictures if that is useful. I see that the pictures themselves are not often categorized in the same main (yet specific) category as the article which references the picture. Do you see what I mean?
:: 3. Thanks for the support on the picture upload rights. I would also like to put time into categorizing the pictures if that is useful. I see that the pictures themselves are not often categorized in the same main (yet specific) category as the article which references the picture. Do you see what I mean?
:::New content with decent size articles and/or expansion of stub articles is the biggest priority. You could tackle the red links as a part of this process. 12:53, 30 December 2014 (EST)
:::New content with decent size articles and/or expansion of stub articles is the biggest priority. You could tackle the red links as a part of this process.
:::As far as new content goes, it is good for the content to be original content rather than pasting from other web pages. Readers prefer original content in new articles. I endeavor to have 85% or more of a new webpage to be content that is not already on Conservapedia. So don't create big "See also" sections which are pasted from other articles.
::::Roger that. Will do. In January, I am planning to write several hundred one or two paragraph stubs with 1 bibliographic reference with a short pertinent "See Also" / 1 or 2 "External Links" / "References" / "Categories" and perhaps a 1 book "Further Reading" section to "sweep up" my red links and to help with Categorization of each stub. Then I will go back in February and flesh out the my 50 stubs into full fledged articles as appropriate. [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 13:04, 30 December 2014 (EST)
:::::As far as new content goes, it is good for the content to be original content rather than pasting from other web pages. Readers prefer original content in new articles. I endeavor to have 85% or more of a new webpage to be content that is not already on Conservapedia. So don't create big "See also" sections which are pasted from other articles.
:::I hope this helps. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:01, 30 December 2014 (EST)
:::I hope this helps. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:01, 30 December 2014 (EST)