Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,736
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 414:
Line 414: − + +
User talk:TheAmericanRedoubt (view source)
Revision as of 18:37, December 30, 2014
, 18:37, December 30, 2014→two matters
::I just reviewed the article [[strategic relocation]]. A large proportion of the article is the "see also" section. You want to avoid doing this. I would fill in the [[strategic relocation]] with more content so a large proportion of the article is not the "see also" section. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:23, 30 December 2014 (EST)
::I just reviewed the article [[strategic relocation]]. A large proportion of the article is the "see also" section. You want to avoid doing this. I would fill in the [[strategic relocation]] with more content so a large proportion of the article is not the "see also" section. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:23, 30 December 2014 (EST)
:::Got it. I was trying to make AlanE happy by sweeping up red and fleshing [[Strategic relocation]] out later.
:::Got it. I was trying to make AlanE happy by sweeping up red and fleshing [[Strategic relocation]] out later.
::::I just did a search on the internet to give you better advice. According to the latest research, readers like web articles that are between 2,300 to 2,500 words long and they want the content to be as much original content as possible (like a unique resource) or not merely cut and paste. So that is a good rule of thumb. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:37, 30 December 2014 (EST)
==New Templates Approval?==
==New Templates Approval?==