Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Retired user"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Protected "Template talk:Retired user" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed])
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
:*Well it's a concern of Admins, Doctor. Nothing to see here, move along, please. --~ [[User:TK|<sup>Sysop-</sup>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 09:53, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:*Well it's a concern of Admins, Doctor. Nothing to see here, move along, please. --~ [[User:TK|<sup>Sysop-</sup>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 09:53, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Terry, nice to say, but it does concern me when something is clearly deceptive.  I'm not a big fan of deception/lying.  You guys could just be honest and list them as banned for "sysop reasons" or something.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 10:16, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:16, April 17, 2007

You suggest that this template is for banned users, yet it says "retired". Perhaps a less deceptive concoction could be offered?--PalMDtalk 09:29, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

I wanted to ask that.
WhatIsG0ing0n 09:38, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
I merely put into a template a notice that had been placed on a couple of pages. The wording was not mine. Philip J. Rayment 09:52, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Well it's a concern of Admins, Doctor. Nothing to see here, move along, please. --~ Sysop-TK /MyTalk 09:53, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
Terry, nice to say, but it does concern me when something is clearly deceptive. I'm not a big fan of deception/lying. You guys could just be honest and list them as banned for "sysop reasons" or something.--PalMDtalk 10:16, 17 April 2007 (EDT)