Difference between revisions of "Talk:Golden Rule"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Not meaning to be disrespectful, but this article seems very out of place on an encyclopedia. "The Golden Rule" seems like a fairly childish idea, and is pure PoV. Does this article need t...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Not meaning to be disrespectful, but this article seems very out of place on an encyclopedia. "The Golden Rule" seems like a fairly childish idea, and is pure PoV. Does this article need to exist, or should there not be a disclaimer paragraph at the top, such as the one found at the top of "Essay" pages? [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 12:09, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Not meaning to be disrespectful, but this article seems very out of place on an encyclopedia. "The Golden Rule" seems like a fairly childish idea, and is pure PoV. Does this article need to exist, or should there not be a disclaimer paragraph at the top, such as the one found at the top of "Essay" pages? [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 12:09, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
How is it POV? It has supporting quotes. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 12:17, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:17, April 17, 2007

Not meaning to be disrespectful, but this article seems very out of place on an encyclopedia. "The Golden Rule" seems like a fairly childish idea, and is pure PoV. Does this article need to exist, or should there not be a disclaimer paragraph at the top, such as the one found at the top of "Essay" pages? MatteeNeutra 12:09, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

How is it POV? It has supporting quotes. Flippin 12:17, 17 April 2007 (EDT)