Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sanskrit"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Then you would appreciate Holst. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 02:51, 10 January 2015 (EST) | :Then you would appreciate Holst. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 02:51, 10 January 2015 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Thinking of my mate Gustav has started me thinking. (I do that occasionally). But to family time now and more in the morning.[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 03:07, 10 January 2015 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 08:07, January 10, 2015
Sanskrit is not related to Basque. Who wrote this?
Sanskrit not Sanskirt
Sanskrit is among the greats as languages- a classical language from which many have been derived
- TAR, You're right. I didn't read the article properly. My bad. AlanE 02:22, 10 January 2015 (EST)
- No worries, your comment helped me improve the Sanskrit article I was going to get to in a few weeks. Over time, you will see more clearly why I added certain articles to certain existing categories. I have a lot to contribute in these areas. In the case of Sanskrit, practicing Ayurveda for so long and having studied it in India is why I can read Devanagari script and know about 1000 words of Sanskrit. Good day. TheAmericanRedoubt 02:41, 10 January 2015 (EST)
- Then you would appreciate Holst. AlanE 02:51, 10 January 2015 (EST)
- Thinking of my mate Gustav has started me thinking. (I do that occasionally). But to family time now and more in the morning.AlanE 03:07, 10 January 2015 (EST)