Difference between revisions of "Seventh Amendment"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(expand)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The '''{{PAGENAME}}''' to the [[United States Constitution]] states:
 
The '''{{PAGENAME}}''' to the [[United States Constitution]] states:
−
{{cquote|'''In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a [[jury]], shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.'''}}
+
{{cquote|In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a [[jury]], shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.}}
 +
 
 +
The Seventh Amendment has been interpreted by a number of court cases.  In ''[[Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.]]'', 518 U.S. 415 (1996), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] upheld an award of compensatory damages against a claim that it was excessive under [[New York]] law.  The Court ruled that appellate review of a federal trial court's refusal to set aside a jury verdict as excessive is reconcilable with the Seventh Amendment if "appellate control [is] limited to review for 'abuse of discretion.'" ''Id.'' at 419. In ''[[Weisgram v. Marley Co.]]'', 528 U.S. 440 (2000), a unanimous [[U.S. Supreme Court]]  held that federal trial and appellate courts have the authority to decide, as a matter of law, that judgment should be entered in favor of a verdict loser after unreliable and inadmissible expert testimony is excluded.
  
 
{{US amendments}}
 
{{US amendments}}
Line 6: Line 8:
 
[[Category : Seventh Amendment]]
 
[[Category : Seventh Amendment]]
 
[[Category : Bill of Rights]]
 
[[Category : Bill of Rights]]
−
[[Category : United States Constitution]]
 

Revision as of 23:10, January 11, 2015

The Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution states:

“ In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. ”

The Seventh Amendment has been interpreted by a number of court cases. In Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc., 518 U.S. 415 (1996), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld an award of compensatory damages against a claim that it was excessive under New York law. The Court ruled that appellate review of a federal trial court's refusal to set aside a jury verdict as excessive is reconcilable with the Seventh Amendment if "appellate control [is] limited to review for 'abuse of discretion.'" Id. at 419. In Weisgram v. Marley Co., 528 U.S. 440 (2000), a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court held that federal trial and appellate courts have the authority to decide, as a matter of law, that judgment should be entered in favor of a verdict loser after unreliable and inadmissible expert testimony is excluded.

Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America
16th Amendment.jpg

Bill of Rights:
1 - Freedom of speech, press, religion, etc.
2 - Right to bear arms
3 - Quartering of soldiers
4 - Warrants
5 - Due process
6 - Right to a speedy trial
7 - Right by trial of a jury
8 - No cruel or unusual punishments
9 - Unenumerated rights
10 - Power to the people and states


11 - Immunity of states to foreign suits
12 - Revision of presidential election procedures
13 - Abolition of slavery
14 - Citizenship
15 - Racial suffrage
16 - Federal income tax
17 - Direct election of the United States Senate
18 - Prohibition of alcohol
19 - Women's suffrage
20 - Terms of the presidency
21 - Repeal of Eighteenth Amendment
22 - Limits the president to two terms
23 - District of Columbia Voting for President
24 - Prohibition of poll taxes
25 - Presidential disabilities
26 - Voting age lowered to 18
27 - Variance of congressional compensation