Talk:Essay:Motivation for the Hypothesis of Intelligent Design

If this page gets deleted, than I don't see why Essay:Motivations for the Theory of Evolution can't go bye-bye as well. --Hojimachong^talk 23:04, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

This is nothing but an array of pot-shots written by a speculative doctor with no citation anywhere. I'm sorry, but it sounds more like the ramblings of someone that doesn't beleive in Intelligent Design more than a legitimate intellectual attack against the belief. You clearly don't agree with the message and structure of Conservapedia - why are you here? --Thammersmith 14:38, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

There isn't a single citation in the other essay; at least PalmD001 is only sticking to bashing ID, whereas Aschlafly seems to have pulled figures out of his head to snipe at evolution.

'You clearly don't agree with the message and structure of Conservapedia - why are you here?'

It has been expressly stated that anyone (even liberals! even Hojimachong!) can contribute to CP in order to make it 'fair' and 'balanced'. -- Wikinterpreter^talk?