Difference between revisions of "C.N. v. Ridgewood"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Undo revision 1142503 by RSM (talk))
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Inky binky bonky
+
'''''C. N. v. Ridgewood Bd. of Educ.''''', 430 F.3d 159 (3rd Cir. 2006), was a case brought by parents against their school district for asking personal questions of their children in a survey without parental permission.  The questions concerned [[drug]] use, [[sex]], [[suicide]], and many other privacy-invading issues.
  
−
daddy had a donkey
+
The [[Court of Appeals]], in a decision joined by future [[U.S. Supreme Court]] Justice [[Samuel Alito]], held that parents had no right to be informed about the survey beforehand and no right to require their consent before compelling their children to answer.
−
 
+
[[Category:United States Law]]
−
donkey died
 
−
 
 
−
daddy cried
 
−
 
 
−
inky binky bonky
 

Revision as of 00:40, February 27, 2015

C. N. v. Ridgewood Bd. of Educ., 430 F.3d 159 (3rd Cir. 2006), was a case brought by parents against their school district for asking personal questions of their children in a survey without parental permission. The questions concerned drug use, sex, suicide, and many other privacy-invading issues.

The Court of Appeals, in a decision joined by future U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, held that parents had no right to be informed about the survey beforehand and no right to require their consent before compelling their children to answer.