Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eyespot"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
My view is that as long as the science stays, it doesn't hurt to acknowledge that some people see it differently.--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 20:26, 18 April 2007 (EDT) | My view is that as long as the science stays, it doesn't hurt to acknowledge that some people see it differently.--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 20:26, 18 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Fine by me.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:32, April 19, 2007
The policy here is or at least should be equal time. Insert counterbalancing claims, but leave the scientific ones.-AmesGyo! 20:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
- "Should be" doesn't cut it. I don't remember Andy saying that equal time is the rule. If he did, then he is contradicting the Panel. --Hojimachongtalk 20:09, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
My view is that as long as the science stays, it doesn't hurt to acknowledge that some people see it differently.--Britinme 20:26, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
- Fine by me.-AmesGyo!