Difference between revisions of "Corker law"
(Senator Bob Corker, a RINO from Tennessee, introduced this bill as a compromise with respect to the proposed deal being negotiated by the Obama Administration with Iran.) |
(constitutionality) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Only one senator voted against this law: [[Tom Cotton]], who explains that it violates the Constitution. He explained:<ref>http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/241355-senate-votes-to-approve-Iran-review-bill</ref> | Only one senator voted against this law: [[Tom Cotton]], who explains that it violates the Constitution. He explained:<ref>http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/241355-senate-votes-to-approve-Iran-review-bill</ref> | ||
{{cquote|A nuclear-arms agreement with any adversary—especially the terror-sponsoring, Islamist Iranian regime—should be submitted as a treaty and obtain a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate as required by the Constitution.}} | {{cquote|A nuclear-arms agreement with any adversary—especially the terror-sponsoring, Islamist Iranian regime—should be submitted as a treaty and obtain a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate as required by the Constitution.}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
Senator [[Bob Corker]], a [[RINO]] from [[Tennessee]], introduced this bill as a compromise with respect to the proposed deal being negotiated by the [[Obama Administration]] with [[Iran]]. | Senator [[Bob Corker]], a [[RINO]] from [[Tennessee]], introduced this bill as a compromise with respect to the proposed deal being negotiated by the [[Obama Administration]] with [[Iran]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Constitutionality == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has never addressed the constitutionality of this approach. | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 20:56, August 10, 2015
The Corker Law, officially known as Bipartisan Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act and informally still called the "Corker bill," is a misguided federal law that circumvents the Treaty Clause in the U.S. Constitution, and essentially requires not a 2/3rds vote to ratify a foreign treaty, but a 2/3rds vote to reject one (in order to override a presidential veto). In other words, the Corker law replaces the Treaty Clause with respect to Iran such that a majority vote in Congress can reject the deal, but the president can then reject the congressional vote, which would require a 2/3rds vote by each house of Congress to override the veto.
Only one senator voted against this law: Tom Cotton, who explains that it violates the Constitution. He explained:[1]
| “ | A nuclear-arms agreement with any adversary—especially the terror-sponsoring, Islamist Iranian regime—should be submitted as a treaty and obtain a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate as required by the Constitution. | ” |
Background
Senator Bob Corker, a RINO from Tennessee, introduced this bill as a compromise with respect to the proposed deal being negotiated by the Obama Administration with Iran.
Constitutionality
The U.S. Supreme Court has never addressed the constitutionality of this approach.