Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Quality"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Only 5 out of the 10 randomly selected articles was any good.) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 17:44, April 19, 2007
I am sorry to say that I must give Conservapedia a failing grade, on the basis of this survey. Only 5 out of the 10 randomly selected articles was any good. Two more were merely definitions of the term (25 words or less). The rest should be deleted.
If we can get to 90% we call start bragging. So let's do it!