Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bird"
From Conservapedia
(New page: This article is a complete and utter disgrace. Stand back from this, and ask yourselves what is going on here? If this really is to be used as a resource, i.e. an encyclopaedia, then some...) |
(facts about birds which have nothing to do with the origins debate) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Stand back from this, and ask yourselves what is going on here? | Stand back from this, and ask yourselves what is going on here? | ||
| − | If this really is to be used as a resource, i.e. an encyclopaedia, then someone looking up the word 'bird', is looking to find out about birds, and not wanting to get into a discussion of whether or not birds descended from | + | If this really is to be used as a resource, i.e. an encyclopaedia, then someone looking up the word 'bird', is looking to find out about birds, and not wanting to get into a discussion of whether or not birds descended from dinosaurs or not. This should have a typology of birds, in to different types, species etc, as well as discussing anatomical details, breeding habits and all sorts of stuff like that. Right at the end, perhaps there could be stuff about bird origins, but taking up 95% of the article, come on! |
--[[User:Felix|Felix]] 17:27, 19 April 2007 (EDT) | --[[User:Felix|Felix]] 17:27, 19 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :So far, this article has focussed on the supposition by evolutionists that birds and dinosaurs are related. If you can add some facts about birds which have nothing to do with the [[origins debate]], we'd all be happy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:32, 19 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:32, April 19, 2007
This article is a complete and utter disgrace.
Stand back from this, and ask yourselves what is going on here? If this really is to be used as a resource, i.e. an encyclopaedia, then someone looking up the word 'bird', is looking to find out about birds, and not wanting to get into a discussion of whether or not birds descended from dinosaurs or not. This should have a typology of birds, in to different types, species etc, as well as discussing anatomical details, breeding habits and all sorts of stuff like that. Right at the end, perhaps there could be stuff about bird origins, but taking up 95% of the article, come on! --Felix 17:27, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
- So far, this article has focussed on the supposition by evolutionists that birds and dinosaurs are related. If you can add some facts about birds which have nothing to do with the origins debate, we'd all be happy. --Ed Poor 17:32, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
