Difference between revisions of "Talk:Archaeopteryx"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Italics) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Amongst pro-evolution scientists Feduccia's research is considered to be completely disproven. Referencing his research without mentioning the dozens of papers that refute it makes the conservapedia appear biased and/or out of date. | Amongst pro-evolution scientists Feduccia's research is considered to be completely disproven. Referencing his research without mentioning the dozens of papers that refute it makes the conservapedia appear biased and/or out of date. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Italics == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Folks, please. No matter what your view, it's proper scientific style to use italics. [[User:Sterile|Sterile]] 22:21, 19 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:21, April 20, 2007
Amongst pro-evolution scientists Feduccia's research is considered to be completely disproven. Referencing his research without mentioning the dozens of papers that refute it makes the conservapedia appear biased and/or out of date.
Italics
Folks, please. No matter what your view, it's proper scientific style to use italics. Sterile 22:21, 19 April 2007 (EDT)