Difference between revisions of "Sysop talk:Talk/Archive 1"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Protected "Conservapedia talk:Sysops" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]) |
Rob Pommer (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: Oh, I thought they were, but maybe I'm mistaken.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:11, 16 April 2007 (EDT) | :: Oh, I thought they were, but maybe I'm mistaken.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:11, 16 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ==The site is under attack as of 0045== | ||
| + | [[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> | ||
Revision as of 04:45, April 20, 2007
Aschlafly spake thusly:I don't think this is the first time anyone has thought of this. I would expect Google's search engines to recognize this scam and filter it fairly soon. But if not, the perpetrators are using our name without our permission and I think that violates our intellectual property. We'll have them explain themselves to a judge if they want to persist in this. Also, we can tell their ISP and it will stop intellectual property violations that use its machines. -- 19:27, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
- Given that the copyright is as it is, the offensive redirect may not violate anything? They are not using the name Conservapedia at all, no?-- Rob Pommertalk 00:59, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
- Oh, I thought they were, but maybe I'm mistaken.--Aschlafly 01:11, 16 April 2007 (EDT)