Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cellular automaton"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: <sharp intake of breath> Now that's a bit daring isn't it? Claiming that the cellular automaton evolves. I am sure thet the young automaton creationists will really object to that. Perhap...) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Now that's a bit daring isn't it? Claiming that the cellular automaton evolves. I am sure thet the young automaton creationists will really object to that. Perhaps you ought to find a bible code source to balance this extreme evolutionist assertion.--[[User:Felix|Felix]] 05:30, 20 April 2007 (EDT) | Now that's a bit daring isn't it? Claiming that the cellular automaton evolves. I am sure thet the young automaton creationists will really object to that. Perhaps you ought to find a bible code source to balance this extreme evolutionist assertion.--[[User:Felix|Felix]] 05:30, 20 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::actully I'm evolutionist.[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 05:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::: Sorry, I didn't know. Condolences.--[[User:Felix|Felix]] 05:47, 20 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:47, April 20, 2007
<sharp intake of breath>
Now that's a bit daring isn't it? Claiming that the cellular automaton evolves. I am sure thet the young automaton creationists will really object to that. Perhaps you ought to find a bible code source to balance this extreme evolutionist assertion.--Felix 05:30, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
- actully I'm evolutionist.Jaques 05:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
- Sorry, I didn't know. Condolences.--Felix 05:47, 20 April 2007 (EDT)