Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gun"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
:Most of this is relevant to the [[gun control]] / [[gun ownership]] debate. I do hope we will present the conservative side of this and not only the liberal side. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 08:27, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:Most of this is relevant to the [[gun control]] / [[gun ownership]] debate. I do hope we will present the conservative side of this and not only the liberal side. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 08:27, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
  
−
machineguns and 20mm+ heavy MGs are indirect fire weapons?! '''ROFLMAO''' jesus christ! i bet you don't even know what is indirect fire!
+
machineguns and 20mm+ heavy MGs are indirect fire weapons?! '''ROFLMAO''' i bet you don't even know what is indirect fire!
 +
 
 +
Jesus Christ is LORD!

Revision as of 00:20, April 21, 2007

Most of the first section seemed rather patronizing

The first two sentances are VERY patronizing.

'Some guns fire small bullets. Some guns fire big bullets. Some guns fire very big bullets'

Is this aimed at 5 year olds?! This could be a very good article with a little work. Jennisuk 22:08, 28 March 2007 (EDT)

Cut from first section:
... are tools generally designed for firing bullets in a controlled manner. They have traditionally been used for two purposes: firing bullets at people, and threatening to fire bullets at people. Thus, a gun is considered a weapon, though technically, the bullet is the weapon, unless the gun itself is used as a club, or as a spear if it has a bayonet attached.
Most of this is relevant to the gun control / gun ownership debate. I do hope we will present the conservative side of this and not only the liberal side. --Ed Poor 08:27, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

machineguns and 20mm+ heavy MGs are indirect fire weapons?! ROFLMAO i bet you don't even know what is indirect fire!

Jesus Christ is LORD!