Difference between revisions of "Soft money"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(clean up)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Soft money is subject to fewer regulations because it is not spent as effectively as [[hard money]].  For example, soft money cannot be used to "expressly advocate" voting for a candidate.
 
Soft money is subject to fewer regulations because it is not spent as effectively as [[hard money]].  For example, soft money cannot be used to "expressly advocate" voting for a candidate.
  
−
==See Also==
+
==See also==
 
* [[Hard money]]
 
* [[Hard money]]
 
* [[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]  
 
* [[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]  
 
* [[Lobbyist]]
 
* [[Lobbyist]]
−
 
−
==External Sites==
 
−
* Durden, Tyler, "[http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-16/words-greatest-investment-every-dollar-spent-influencing-us-politics-corporations-ge The Best "Democracy" Money Can Buy: For Every Dollar Spent Influencing US Politics, Corporations Get $760 Back"], [[Zero Hedge]], Published March 16, 2015.
 
  
 
[[Category:Election Terms]]
 
[[Category:Election Terms]]
−
[[Category:Banksters]]
 
−
[[Category:Finance]]
 
−
[[Category:Corruption]]
 
−
[[Category:Deceit]]
 

Latest revision as of 00:20, March 2, 2016

Soft money are donations and expenditures that are spent indirectly on elections in ways other than donations to a politician/candidate's campaign.

Soft money is subject to fewer regulations because it is not spent as effectively as hard money. For example, soft money cannot be used to "expressly advocate" voting for a candidate.

See also