Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jurassic"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Young earth?: Circular argument)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== Young earth? ==
 
== Young earth? ==
  
−
-------
 
 
It says that earth is young, but that is because the layers of the earth are constantly changing
 
It says that earth is young, but that is because the layers of the earth are constantly changing
  
 
Easy, easy, not need to bomb me, but the Carbon-14 tests proves that there are things older than 10000 years, and another "prove": god didn't say that :D [[User:Schwarze|Schwarze]] 20:53, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Easy, easy, not need to bomb me, but the Carbon-14 tests proves that there are things older than 10000 years, and another "prove": god didn't say that :D [[User:Schwarze|Schwarze]] 20:53, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Carbon-14 dating is based on the presumption that Biblical history is wrong (it assumes no Flood, therefore assumes not effect on the C14 balance in the atmosphere from the Flood), so cannot be used to disprove the Flood, as the argument assumes what it attempts to prove.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:00, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 09:00, April 21, 2007

This needs an edit. It's not 'according to evolutionary scientists' it's 'according to geologists', and there should be a citation. However, the edit page doesn't seem to be the same as the article, so I don't want to edit it myself. Britinme 6:30pm 2 April 2007 (EDT)

Young earth?

It says that earth is young, but that is because the layers of the earth are constantly changing

Easy, easy, not need to bomb me, but the Carbon-14 tests proves that there are things older than 10000 years, and another "prove": god didn't say that :D Schwarze 20:53, 20 April 2007 (EDT)

Carbon-14 dating is based on the presumption that Biblical history is wrong (it assumes no Flood, therefore assumes not effect on the C14 balance in the atmosphere from the Flood), so cannot be used to disprove the Flood, as the argument assumes what it attempts to prove. Philip J. Rayment 05:00, 21 April 2007 (EDT)