Difference between revisions of "Talk:Progressivism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Section: Understanding Progressive Ideology: Amendment of the Constitution)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
Looking at the platform of the Bull Moose Party(and I hope every conservative will read this platform) there are some things that are so nebulous that they can't be quantified.  It's merely campaign rhetoric.(Campaign rhetoric is not necessarily good nor bad, it just is)  Examples of this from the platform are the section on "The Old Parties", and some parts of the section on "Social and Industrial Justice".  Conversely, the call for a living wage needs no explanation needs no explanation in the table, along with others.
 
Looking at the platform of the Bull Moose Party(and I hope every conservative will read this platform) there are some things that are so nebulous that they can't be quantified.  It's merely campaign rhetoric.(Campaign rhetoric is not necessarily good nor bad, it just is)  Examples of this from the platform are the section on "The Old Parties", and some parts of the section on "Social and Industrial Justice".  Conversely, the call for a living wage needs no explanation needs no explanation in the table, along with others.
 +
 +
--------------------
 +
:Amendment of the Constitution
 +
:This is a long time dream of progressives, to finally get around that pesky Constitution.  The beneficiary they point to is a nebulous "the people".  What the progressives ended up settling on is the concept of the [[Living Constitution]].  Since Judges can on a whim decide what the Constitution means at any given moment, the progressives no longer have a need for a reform of the amendment process.  The Judges do it in real-time now.

Revision as of 14:59, March 30, 2016

This article should be written. By that I mean having the entire article be a quote doesn't tell anyone anything except you are lazy. Rellik 15:47, 27 April 2008 (EDT)

After World War I

Where did all of the progressives go? Did they all of a sudden give up their ideas, admit that they were wrong, and seek another path? Or did they just put on masks and change the label on the box?

Section: Understanding Progressive Ideology

I created a simple table to help illustrate the claims of Progressivism about how "x group" or "x initiative" will be helped, but in reality the actual beneficiary is always, always big government.

Looking at the platform of the Bull Moose Party(and I hope every conservative will read this platform) there are some things that are so nebulous that they can't be quantified. It's merely campaign rhetoric.(Campaign rhetoric is not necessarily good nor bad, it just is) Examples of this from the platform are the section on "The Old Parties", and some parts of the section on "Social and Industrial Justice". Conversely, the call for a living wage needs no explanation needs no explanation in the table, along with others.


Amendment of the Constitution
This is a long time dream of progressives, to finally get around that pesky Constitution. The beneficiary they point to is a nebulous "the people". What the progressives ended up settling on is the concept of the Living Constitution. Since Judges can on a whim decide what the Constitution means at any given moment, the progressives no longer have a need for a reform of the amendment process. The Judges do it in real-time now.