Difference between revisions of "Guy Chapman"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(expand article) |
(add links) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Disputes== | ==Disputes== | ||
| − | Guy's dogmatic views on subjects including [[anthropogenic global warming]] and [[vaccination]] have led some Wikipedia editors to criticize him for [ | + | Guy's dogmatic views on subjects including [[anthropogenic global warming]] and [[vaccination]] have led some Wikipedia editors to criticize him for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Advocacy advocacy]. On 1 April 2016 Guy tried to ban editor [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Conzar Conzar] from editing the article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaxxed Vaxxed], whioh describes a film about the controversial work of Dr [[Scientists whose careers were ruined|Andrew Wakefield]]. This dispute is ongoing. |
[[Category:Wikipedia]] | [[Category:Wikipedia]] | ||
Revision as of 20:17, April 1, 2016
- It has been proposed that this page, :Guy Chapman, be titled, "Guy Chapman".
Guy, or User:JzG, is an influential administrator at Wikipedia. A link from his Wikipedia talk page shows that his real name is Guy Chapman. Guy appears to have replaced William M. Connolley as the chief enforcer of Wikipedia's alleged neutral point of view. Many conservatives regard Wikipedia's "neutral point of view" as a liberal point of view, see Examples of Bias in Wikipedia.
Disputes
Guy's dogmatic views on subjects including anthropogenic global warming and vaccination have led some Wikipedia editors to criticize him for advocacy. On 1 April 2016 Guy tried to ban editor Conzar from editing the article Vaxxed, whioh describes a film about the controversial work of Dr Andrew Wakefield. This dispute is ongoing.