Difference between revisions of "Talk:Quoting out of context"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(agreeing with Philip, as usual! :-)
(Echoes)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
:Agreed. My first draft was hasty, sloppy, and inaccurate. :-( --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:47, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Agreed. My first draft was hasty, sloppy, and inaccurate. :-( --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:47, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
::Aren't first drafts supposed to be hasty, sloppy, and inaccurate. :-)  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:54, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
  
 
== 'attempts to "use a person's words" against them' ==
 
== 'attempts to "use a person's words" against them' ==
Line 8: Line 9:
  
 
:Agreed. My first draft was hasty, sloppy, and inaccurate. :-( --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:47, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Agreed. My first draft was hasty, sloppy, and inaccurate. :-( --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:47, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
::Aren't first drafts supposed to be hasty, sloppy, and inaccurate. :-)  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:54, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:54, April 21, 2007

Quote mining

I don't believe that quote mining and taking quotes out of context are the same thing. I think that quote mining is a pejorative term for looking for lots of quotes from your opponents to support your point of view rather than building an argument yourself. Philip J. Rayment 11:41, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

Agreed. My first draft was hasty, sloppy, and inaccurate. :-( --Ed Poor 11:47, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
Aren't first drafts supposed to be hasty, sloppy, and inaccurate. :-) Philip J. Rayment 11:54, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

'attempts to "use a person's words" against them'

Taking a quote out of context is not synonymous with attempting to use a person's words against them. You can do the latter without taking a quote out of context, and taking a quote out of context is usually (in my opinion) inadvertent (although possibly due to carelessness, ideologically blinkers, etc.), not something that you attempt to do. Philip J. Rayment 11:41, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

Agreed. My first draft was hasty, sloppy, and inaccurate. :-( --Ed Poor 11:47, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
Aren't first drafts supposed to be hasty, sloppy, and inaccurate. :-) Philip J. Rayment 11:54, 21 April 2007 (EDT)