Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, rollback
19,369
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + + + + Line 4:
Line 14: − ==Discussion==+ + Line 80:
Line 91: + + + + + + + + +
rm unlock cat.
==Please Move Category to Conspiracy Theorists CAPITAL T ==
Dear Admins, Please correct Category:Conspiracy theorists to Category:Conspiracy '''T'''heorists. I converted from lowercase to the proper Conservapedia standard of upper case for each word of a category name and moved all the entries but this locked one.
Thank you.
[[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 14:31, 4 December 2014 (EST)
----
==Discussion==
can you at least leave the part about exploitng her sons death for '''Political gain'''? (no doubt she has)[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
can you at least leave the part about exploitng her sons death for '''Political gain'''? (no doubt she has)[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
:::perhaps a better question would be if she has any shame. she has been heavily criticised for many things. You dont hear about this from the liberal media. Perhaps you should do some research. (I plan to add these later)[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
:::perhaps a better question would be if she has any shame. she has been heavily criticised for many things. You dont hear about this from the liberal media. Perhaps you should do some research. (I plan to add these later)[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
by the way, did not you hear that her own relatives released a statement saying that she was exloiting her sons death. when she said that her immediate family supported her, her husband divorced her. I am not putting these facts in the article yet because i am looking for a good source. apparently, i have some shame. please dont insult me.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
by the way, did not you hear that her own relatives released a statement saying that she was exloiting her sons death. when she said that her immediate family supported her, her husband divorced her. I am not putting these facts in the article yet because i am looking for a good source. apparently, i have some shame. please dont insult me.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
:Get a cite (or cites) and we'll examine the veracity of the claim. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:56, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
:Get a cite (or cites) and we'll examine the veracity of the claim. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:56, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
==Duke==
Is it proper to include David Duke's support? The KKK supported Bush for president, but that doesn't mean he supports them. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 00:20, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
Is it proper to include David Duke's support? The KKK supported Bush for president, but that doesn't mean he supports them. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 00:20, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
::remove it if you really want. But i think she actually would support him, at least regarding Israel. go ahead and take it out.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
::remove it if you really want. But i think she actually would support him, at least regarding Israel. go ahead and take it out.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
::::When that criticism is based upon holding Israel "to a standard of behaviour demanded of no other country while at the same time singling them out for a campaign of villification based on demonstrable falsehoods" then it is anti-semitic. And comes from "exactly the same kind of useful idiots who once supported Stalin, and waved aside all those who spoke up against the killings and the terror" [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 15:00, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
::::When that criticism is based upon holding Israel "to a standard of behaviour demanded of no other country while at the same time singling them out for a campaign of villification based on demonstrable falsehoods" then it is anti-semitic. And comes from "exactly the same kind of useful idiots who once supported Stalin, and waved aside all those who spoke up against the killings and the terror" [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 15:00, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
===Back To Cindy===
I assume the photo of her with Chavez is supposed to say she's anti-american? Whether or not you agree with the woman everyone must admit that she got into the game as a result of her son's death. So if there is to be a picture of her with someone that is part of her public story then maybe it should be her son. Or would that be too politically biased? [[User:Priestspez|Priestspez]] 02:22, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
:The photo does not say anything other than that she traveled to Venezuala to meet with Chavez (apparently at his invitation) and make public radio broadcasts with Chavez critical of US foreign policy. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:38, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
== suggestion ==
This article appears to be locked so I can't edit it, but can I suggest removal of the word "recently" in the last sentence of the 1st paragraph? Bush has not been President for quite a while, so I don't think she recently called for his impeachment. A small point, but I think it would make the article look better. Thanks. [[User:AngusT|AngusT]] 10:40, 18 August 2010 (EDT)