1,263
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 184:
Line 184: +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 00:42, January 30, 2007
, 00:42, January 30, 2007no edit summary
'''REPLY''' The reader can be the judge of bias. Personally, and I'm sure many would agree with me, I feel that someone who names himself after a character in a children's book (a book to which many Christians object, by the way), '''and''' also calls himself "Nearly Headless Nick", is not likely to be an informed, fair judge of someone else's work. Of course you're free to disagree with my conclusion, but censoring this information so that others would be unable to draw their own conclusions is unjustified. --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:25, 29 January 2007 (EST)
'''REPLY''' The reader can be the judge of bias. Personally, and I'm sure many would agree with me, I feel that someone who names himself after a character in a children's book (a book to which many Christians object, by the way), '''and''' also calls himself "Nearly Headless Nick", is not likely to be an informed, fair judge of someone else's work. Of course you're free to disagree with my conclusion, but censoring this information so that others would be unable to draw their own conclusions is unjustified. --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:25, 29 January 2007 (EST)
*Well said Mr Schlafly... [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 19:38, 29 January 2007 (EST)
*Well said Mr Schlafly... [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 19:38, 29 January 2007 (EST)
'''Reply''' Nearly Headless Nick is the same character in the books as Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington. someone who names themself after a character in a book, is not more or less likely to be an "informed, fair judge of someone else's work" then anyone else. It is a logical fallacy to assume that an editor is bad just because you do not like their name. They do not give out admin priveledges at wikipedia arbitrarily, they are based on (correct me if I am wrong) the contributions of the user who wants to be an admin. It is not "censoring" to remove information from a list to which it does not belong. The user names of wikipedia editors is not usefull information, and does not need to be on Conservapedia. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 19:42, 29 January 2007 (EST)