Difference between revisions of "Abstinence"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 9: Line 9:
 
by Robert E. Rector, Kirk A. Johnson, Ph.D., and Jennifer A. Marshall
 
by Robert E. Rector, Kirk A. Johnson, Ph.D., and Jennifer A. Marshall
 
Center for Data Analysis Report #04-07 [http://www.heritage.org/Research/Abstinence/cda04-07.cfm] </ref>
 
Center for Data Analysis Report #04-07 [http://www.heritage.org/Research/Abstinence/cda04-07.cfm] </ref>
 +
 +
A more recent study indicates that campaigns calling for sexual abstinence are being ignored by most teenagers. <ref>
 +
$1bn 'don't have sex' campaign a flop as research shows teenagers ignore lessons, The Guardian [http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2058066,00.html]</ref>
 +
The abstinence policy of the Bush administration has also been heavily critized as being unrealistic and ignoring the real issues. <ref>Bush "abstinence only" program lies to kids about sex, HIV dangers[http://www.unknownnews.org/04121402abstinence.html]</ref>
 +
  
 
==Notes and references==
 
==Notes and references==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Revision as of 11:52, April 23, 2007

The word abstinence means refraining from indulging in an appetite.

In the 1800s and 1900s, the word "abstinence," used without other explanation, almost always meant abstinence from alcohol. The "abstinence movement," for example, led to the establishment of prohibition. Teetotaler mean someone who advocated "total abstinence," rather than just moderation.

Starting in about the 1990s, "abstinence" has been more commonly used in the context of abstinence from sexual intercourse, particularly in the United States in the context of sex education for adolescents. Thus, for example, we read in a 2002 White House policy statement:

..."the goal of Federal policy should be to emphasize abstinence as the only certain way to avoid both unintended pregnancies and STDs."[1]

The new Democratic-controlled Congress wants to abolish abstinence-only sex education programs, arguing that fornication is the norm (i.e., inevitable). But a 2004 Heritage Foundation study found that virginity pledges significantly reduce premarital sex without putting backsliders at risk. [2]

A more recent study indicates that campaigns calling for sexual abstinence are being ignored by most teenagers. [3] The abstinence policy of the Bush administration has also been heavily critized as being unrealistic and ignoring the real issues. [4]


Notes and references

  1. ↑ WORKING TOWARD INDEPENDENCE Encourage Abstinence and Prevent Teen Pregnancy, White House News and Policies, February 2002
  2. ↑ Teens Who Make Virginity Pledges Have Substantially Improved Life Outcomes by Robert E. Rector, Kirk A. Johnson, Ph.D., and Jennifer A. Marshall Center for Data Analysis Report #04-07 [1]
  3. ↑ $1bn 'don't have sex' campaign a flop as research shows teenagers ignore lessons, The Guardian [2]
  4. ↑ Bush "abstinence only" program lies to kids about sex, HIV dangers[3]